Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC set aside the rejection of refund of unutilized input tax credit on export of services under Section 54 CGST Act read with Rule 89 CGST Rules. The authorities had denied refund on the ground that the exporter furnished FIRAs and a Chartered Accountant's certificate instead of FIRCs as required under a CBIC circular. Relying on its earlier decision in the same assessee's case, HC held that receipt of convertible foreign exchange was established and mere non-furnishing of FIRCs could not justify rejection of refund. Authorities were directed to process the refund claims for the specified tax periods within twelve weeks.
HC set aside the rejection of refund of unutilized input tax credit on export of services under Section 54 CGST Act read with Rule 89 CGST Rules. The authorities had denied refund on the ground that the exporter furnished FIRAs and a Chartered Accountant's certificate instead of FIRCs as required under a CBIC circular. Relying on its earlier decision in the same assessee's case, HC held that receipt of convertible foreign exchange was established and mere non-furnishing of FIRCs could not justify rejection of refund. Authorities were directed to process the refund claims for the specified tax periods within twelve weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.