Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside the rejection of refund of unutilized input tax credit on export of services under Section 54 CGST Act read with Rule 89 CGST Rules. The authorities had denied refund on the ground that the exporter furnished FIRAs and a Chartered Accountant's certificate instead of FIRCs as required under a CBIC circular. Relying on its earlier decision in the same assessee's case, HC held that receipt of convertible foreign exchange was established and mere non-furnishing of FIRCs could not justify rejection of refund. Authorities were directed to process the refund claims for the specified tax periods within twelve weeks.
HC set aside the rejection of refund of unutilized input tax credit on export of services under Section 54 CGST Act read with Rule 89 CGST Rules. The authorities had denied refund on the ground that the exporter furnished FIRAs and a Chartered Accountant's certificate instead of FIRCs as required under a CBIC circular. Relying on its earlier decision in the same assessee's case, HC held that receipt of convertible foreign exchange was established and mere non-furnishing of FIRCs could not justify rejection of refund. Authorities were directed to process the refund claims for the specified tax periods within twelve weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.