Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
HC held that authorities under s.131 possess powers akin to a civil court, including examining persons on oath; therefore, statements recorded thereunder are admissible in principle. Nevertheless, on facts, HC upheld ITAT's deletion of additions under ss.68 and 56(2)(viib), finding no perversity in ITAT's re-appreciation of the third-party statement and noting absence of specific defects in the assessee's share valuation; additions were thus unsustainable and decided in favour of the assessee. HC also upheld ITAT's remand on lease rent paid to a director for fresh examination under s.40A(2). However, on disallowances under ss.36(1)(iii) and 36(1)(va), HC accepted the revenue's challenge, set aside ITAT's remand, and directed ITAT to decide the issue afresh on existing material and law.
HC held that authorities under s.131 possess powers akin to a civil court, including examining persons on oath; therefore, statements recorded thereunder are admissible in principle. Nevertheless, on facts, HC upheld ITAT's deletion of additions under ss.68 and 56(2)(viib), finding no perversity in ITAT's re-appreciation of the third-party statement and noting absence of specific defects in the assessee's share valuation; additions were thus unsustainable and decided in favour of the assessee. HC also upheld ITAT's remand on lease rent paid to a director for fresh examination under s.40A(2). However, on disallowances under ss.36(1)(iii) and 36(1)(va), HC accepted the revenue's challenge, set aside ITAT's remand, and directed ITAT to decide the issue afresh on existing material and law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
