Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that petitioner is a Co-operative Society and not a Co-operative Bank, despite cancellation of its banking licence in 2004. Applying binding SC precedent, the Court ruled that deduction under s.80P(2)(d) is available to a Co-operative Society on interest income from investments with a Co-operative Bank, which itself is a Co-operative Society. The reopening of assessment, premised on the contrary assumption that such deduction was not admissible, was found legally untenable. The impugned reopening notice was quashed and the matter decided in favour of the assessee.
HC held that petitioner is a Co-operative Society and not a Co-operative Bank, despite cancellation of its banking licence in 2004. Applying binding SC precedent, the Court ruled that deduction under s.80P(2)(d) is available to a Co-operative Society on interest income from investments with a Co-operative Bank, which itself is a Co-operative Society. The reopening of assessment, premised on the contrary assumption that such deduction was not admissible, was found legally untenable. The impugned reopening notice was quashed and the matter decided in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.