Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT examined whether income or deemed income arose in the assessee's hands from an alleged transfer of immovable property/shares. On facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of title or interest by the assessee to any third party; there was only a reduction in percentage shareholding, not a conveyance of property rights. Relying on the Delhi HC ruling in a similar transaction, ITAT held that in absence of transfer of any part of interest or title in the immovable property, no income or deemed income could be attributed to the assessee. Additions made in the assessee's hands were therefore unsustainable and stood deleted.
ITAT examined whether income or deemed income arose in the assessee's hands from an alleged transfer of immovable property/shares. On facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of title or interest by the assessee to any third party; there was only a reduction in percentage shareholding, not a conveyance of property rights. Relying on the Delhi HC ruling in a similar transaction, ITAT held that in absence of transfer of any part of interest or title in the immovable property, no income or deemed income could be attributed to the assessee. Additions made in the assessee's hands were therefore unsustainable and stood deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.