Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT examined whether income or deemed income arose in the assessee's hands from an alleged transfer of immovable property/shares. On facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of title or interest by the assessee to any third party; there was only a reduction in percentage shareholding, not a conveyance of property rights. Relying on the Delhi HC ruling in a similar transaction, ITAT held that in absence of transfer of any part of interest or title in the immovable property, no income or deemed income could be attributed to the assessee. Additions made in the assessee's hands were therefore unsustainable and stood deleted.
ITAT examined whether income or deemed income arose in the assessee's hands from an alleged transfer of immovable property/shares. On facts, the Tribunal found no transfer of title or interest by the assessee to any third party; there was only a reduction in percentage shareholding, not a conveyance of property rights. Relying on the Delhi HC ruling in a similar transaction, ITAT held that in absence of transfer of any part of interest or title in the immovable property, no income or deemed income could be attributed to the assessee. Additions made in the assessee's hands were therefore unsustainable and stood deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.