Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that for a non-searched person under s.153C, the "deemed date of search" is the date on which the AO records satisfaction, not the original date of search on the searched party, following the ratio of SC in Jasjit Singh. In this case, the satisfaction note was recorded on 17.02.2022, making AY 2023-24 the relevant assessment year for reckoning the six/ten-year block. Consequently, AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block period. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, holding that the AO lacked valid jurisdiction and quashing the assessments for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 as time-barred and invalid.
ITAT held that for a non-searched person under s.153C, the "deemed date of search" is the date on which the AO records satisfaction, not the original date of search on the searched party, following the ratio of SC in Jasjit Singh. In this case, the satisfaction note was recorded on 17.02.2022, making AY 2023-24 the relevant assessment year for reckoning the six/ten-year block. Consequently, AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block period. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, holding that the AO lacked valid jurisdiction and quashing the assessments for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 as time-barred and invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
