Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT allowed the appeal, set aside the adjudicating authority's order dated 18.08.2020, and declared the attached immovable property as "benami property" under Section 2(9)(A) PBPT Act. It held that purported share application money later shown as unsecured, interest-free loans, without allotment of shares, security, interest, loan agreement, or acknowledgments within limitation, rendered the alleged debt time-barred and unreal, indicating a benami arrangement to route funds for property purchase. The right of Kotak Mahindra Bank, which had granted an overdraft facility prior to the provisional attachment and without knowledge of PBPT proceedings, was expressly protected. The DCIT was given liberty to initiate separate proceedings against the subsequent beneficial owner.
AT allowed the appeal, set aside the adjudicating authority's order dated 18.08.2020, and declared the attached immovable property as "benami property" under Section 2(9)(A) PBPT Act. It held that purported share application money later shown as unsecured, interest-free loans, without allotment of shares, security, interest, loan agreement, or acknowledgments within limitation, rendered the alleged debt time-barred and unreal, indicating a benami arrangement to route funds for property purchase. The right of Kotak Mahindra Bank, which had granted an overdraft facility prior to the provisional attachment and without knowledge of PBPT proceedings, was expressly protected. The DCIT was given liberty to initiate separate proceedings against the subsequent beneficial owner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
