Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that a Deed of Assignment executed nearly eighteen years after commencement of winding up was void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act. The Applicants failed to show that the transaction was in the ordinary course of business, beneficial to the company in liquidation or its creditors, or that any part of the consideration reached the company. Their reliance on Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act was rejected, as the Official Liquidator is only a statutory custodian and not the real owner, making ostensible ownership inapplicable. The Official Liquidator's Report was allowed and the Applicants' Interim Application for ratification dismissed, with liberty to pursue a claim before the Official Liquidator.
HC held that a Deed of Assignment executed nearly eighteen years after commencement of winding up was void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act. The Applicants failed to show that the transaction was in the ordinary course of business, beneficial to the company in liquidation or its creditors, or that any part of the consideration reached the company. Their reliance on Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act was rejected, as the Official Liquidator is only a statutory custodian and not the real owner, making ostensible ownership inapplicable. The Official Liquidator's Report was allowed and the Applicants' Interim Application for ratification dismissed, with liberty to pursue a claim before the Official Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.