Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the NCLT's order rejecting the liquidator's plea for enhanced remuneration and exclusion of seven months from the liquidation period. It held that, under Section 35(1)(f) IBC, the litigations and steps taken to remove encumbrances, lift attachments, and take control of assets are routine statutory duties for effecting sale and value realisation of the corporate debtor's estate, not extraordinary work warranting higher fees or time exclusion. NCLAT found no misinterpretation by NCLT of the liquidator's request as extension of time, and no disregard of binding precedent, and concluded that the application lacked factual foundation and merit. The appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the NCLT's order rejecting the liquidator's plea for enhanced remuneration and exclusion of seven months from the liquidation period. It held that, under Section 35(1)(f) IBC, the litigations and steps taken to remove encumbrances, lift attachments, and take control of assets are routine statutory duties for effecting sale and value realisation of the corporate debtor's estate, not extraordinary work warranting higher fees or time exclusion. NCLAT found no misinterpretation by NCLT of the liquidator's request as extension of time, and no disregard of binding precedent, and concluded that the application lacked factual foundation and merit. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
