Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld concurrent conviction of accused under S.138 NI Act and dismissal of revision. It reiterated that revisional jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent defects or jurisdictional errors and does not permit reappreciation of evidence absent perversity. As issuance and signatures on the cheque were undisputed, statutory presumptions under Ss.118(a) and 139 arose that it was issued towards a legally enforceable debt. The accused failed to adduce credible evidence of repayment or misuse of the cheque to rebut the presumption. Notice was held to be deemed served, and dishonour for "insufficient funds" stood proved. The sentence, including default imprisonment for non-payment of compensation, was found legally sustainable.
HC upheld concurrent conviction of accused under S.138 NI Act and dismissal of revision. It reiterated that revisional jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent defects or jurisdictional errors and does not permit reappreciation of evidence absent perversity. As issuance and signatures on the cheque were undisputed, statutory presumptions under Ss.118(a) and 139 arose that it was issued towards a legally enforceable debt. The accused failed to adduce credible evidence of repayment or misuse of the cheque to rebut the presumption. Notice was held to be deemed served, and dishonour for "insufficient funds" stood proved. The sentence, including default imprisonment for non-payment of compensation, was found legally sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
