Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the blocking of petitioner's electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST/KGST Rules was illegal and unsustainable. The Court found that no pre-decisional hearing was afforded and the impugned order lacked independent, cogent "reasons to believe," being based solely on enforcement reports amounting to impermissible borrowed satisfaction. Relying on binding precedent, HC ruled that these procedural and substantive deficiencies vitiated the exercise of power under Rule 86A. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and respondents were directed to immediately unblock the petitioner's electronic credit ledger to enable filing of returns. The writ petition was allowed.
HC held that the blocking of petitioner's electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST/KGST Rules was illegal and unsustainable. The Court found that no pre-decisional hearing was afforded and the impugned order lacked independent, cogent "reasons to believe," being based solely on enforcement reports amounting to impermissible borrowed satisfaction. Relying on binding precedent, HC ruled that these procedural and substantive deficiencies vitiated the exercise of power under Rule 86A. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and respondents were directed to immediately unblock the petitioner's electronic credit ledger to enable filing of returns. The writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.