Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that minimum guarantee charges/fees paid by Assessee-Company, an online room-booking platform, to various hotel/guest-house owners do not constitute "rent" under s.194I, as the agreements did not grant Assessee any exclusive right to use rooms nor create a lessor-lessee relationship. The payments represented compensation for Assessee's failure to secure agreed minimum bookings or tariff, not consideration for use of premises. ITAT further held that such payments were also not liable for TDS under s.194C. Consequently, Assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS and disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was directed to be deleted.
ITAT held that minimum guarantee charges/fees paid by Assessee-Company, an online room-booking platform, to various hotel/guest-house owners do not constitute "rent" under s.194I, as the agreements did not grant Assessee any exclusive right to use rooms nor create a lessor-lessee relationship. The payments represented compensation for Assessee's failure to secure agreed minimum bookings or tariff, not consideration for use of premises. ITAT further held that such payments were also not liable for TDS under s.194C. Consequently, Assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS and disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.