Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that minimum guarantee charges/fees paid by Assessee-Company, an online room-booking platform, to various hotel/guest-house owners do not constitute "rent" under s.194I, as the agreements did not grant Assessee any exclusive right to use rooms nor create a lessor-lessee relationship. The payments represented compensation for Assessee's failure to secure agreed minimum bookings or tariff, not consideration for use of premises. ITAT further held that such payments were also not liable for TDS under s.194C. Consequently, Assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS and disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was directed to be deleted.
ITAT held that minimum guarantee charges/fees paid by Assessee-Company, an online room-booking platform, to various hotel/guest-house owners do not constitute "rent" under s.194I, as the agreements did not grant Assessee any exclusive right to use rooms nor create a lessor-lessee relationship. The payments represented compensation for Assessee's failure to secure agreed minimum bookings or tariff, not consideration for use of premises. ITAT further held that such payments were also not liable for TDS under s.194C. Consequently, Assessee was not in default for non-deduction of TDS and disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.