Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the assessee failed to discharge the onus of substantiating its claims of expenditure on service fees paid to KMCCL and legal fees paid to M/s CAM, as no enforceable agreements, correspondence, or supporting documents were produced before the lower authorities. However, considering that the issues had not been adjudicated with complete evidence, ITAT remanded both issues to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication. The Commissioner is directed to reconsider the disallowances after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing, while the assessee is directed to file all relevant agreements and communications, failing which no leniency shall be extended regarding the claimed deductions.
ITAT held that the assessee failed to discharge the onus of substantiating its claims of expenditure on service fees paid to KMCCL and legal fees paid to M/s CAM, as no enforceable agreements, correspondence, or supporting documents were produced before the lower authorities. However, considering that the issues had not been adjudicated with complete evidence, ITAT remanded both issues to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication. The Commissioner is directed to reconsider the disallowances after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing, while the assessee is directed to file all relevant agreements and communications, failing which no leniency shall be extended regarding the claimed deductions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
