Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the resident individual assessee, having opted for taxation under section 115BAC(1A) and whose total income for AY 2024-25 did not exceed Rs. 7,00,000, is entitled to rebate under section 87A. It held that neither section 87A nor section 111A contains any express prohibition against allowing rebate on tax payable on STCG taxable under section 111A. The Tribunal noted that denial of rebate by CPC, Bengaluru, was based on system-driven logic without statutory backing. The proposed prospective amendment in Finance Bill 2025 was treated as clarificatory of prior legislative intent.
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the resident individual assessee, having opted for taxation under section 115BAC(1A) and whose total income for AY 2024-25 did not exceed Rs. 7,00,000, is entitled to rebate under section 87A. It held that neither section 87A nor section 111A contains any express prohibition against allowing rebate on tax payable on STCG taxable under section 111A. The Tribunal noted that denial of rebate by CPC, Bengaluru, was based on system-driven logic without statutory backing. The proposed prospective amendment in Finance Bill 2025 was treated as clarificatory of prior legislative intent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
