Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
CESTAT dismissed the appellant's appeal as time-barred, holding that non-service of the adjudication order resulted from the appellant's own negligence. The appellant had vacated its old business premises and surrendered its Import Export License but failed to intimate the Department or the concerned post office regarding the change of address or to arrange redirection of mail. The Tribunal found no evidence of any timely steps to obtain the order after learning of its existence, including the unexplained delay before filing an RTI application. Distinguishing precedent where change of address had been duly notified, CESTAT held there was no sufficient cause to override limitation and sustained the impugned order.
CESTAT dismissed the appellant's appeal as time-barred, holding that non-service of the adjudication order resulted from the appellant's own negligence. The appellant had vacated its old business premises and surrendered its Import Export License but failed to intimate the Department or the concerned post office regarding the change of address or to arrange redirection of mail. The Tribunal found no evidence of any timely steps to obtain the order after learning of its existence, including the unexplained delay before filing an RTI application. Distinguishing precedent where change of address had been duly notified, CESTAT held there was no sufficient cause to override limitation and sustained the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
