Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AT held that contravention of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA read with Para 8 of Schedule I to the 2000 Regulations stood established, as the managing director was responsible for the company's affairs during the relevant period and was thus liable under Section 42(1) FEMA. AT rejected the contention that lack of mens rea or absence of loss to Government or stakeholders negated liability, noting that Section 13(1) does not require mens rea. However, considering subsequent resignation and proportionality, AT reduced the penalty, adjusting the pre-deposit, and partly allowed the appeal.
AT held that contravention of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA read with Para 8 of Schedule I to the 2000 Regulations stood established, as the managing director was responsible for the company's affairs during the relevant period and was thus liable under Section 42(1) FEMA. AT rejected the contention that lack of mens rea or absence of loss to Government or stakeholders negated liability, noting that Section 13(1) does not require mens rea. However, considering subsequent resignation and proportionality, AT reduced the penalty, adjusting the pre-deposit, and partly allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.