Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that cross-LoC barter trade under the 2008 SOP constitutes intra-state supply within the then State of J&K and is amenable to CGST/J&K GST. The impugned SCNs were construed as prima facie issued under Section 74(1) CGST Act on grounds of suppression, found within limitation, and validly "bunched" for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19 given year-wise quantification and specific allegations. The issue of potential double taxation on barter (inward and outward supplies) was left open for adjudication by GST authorities. Holding that efficacious statutory remedies under Sections 74(9) and 107 exist, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction; all writ petitions were found meritless and dismissed.
HC held that cross-LoC barter trade under the 2008 SOP constitutes intra-state supply within the then State of J&K and is amenable to CGST/J&K GST. The impugned SCNs were construed as prima facie issued under Section 74(1) CGST Act on grounds of suppression, found within limitation, and validly "bunched" for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19 given year-wise quantification and specific allegations. The issue of potential double taxation on barter (inward and outward supplies) was left open for adjudication by GST authorities. Holding that efficacious statutory remedies under Sections 74(9) and 107 exist, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction; all writ petitions were found meritless and dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
