Tax authority's substitution of projected figures with actuals overturned; original acquisition valuation upheld; transfer pricing issues remitted for...
Beneficial owner held liable for differential customs duty; royalties added under Rule 10(1)(c); confiscation, penalties under s.111(m), s.114A, s.112...
HC held that cross-LoC barter trade under the 2008 SOP constitutes intra-state supply within the then State of J&K and is amenable to CGST/J&K GST. The impugned SCNs were construed as prima facie issued under Section 74(1) CGST Act on grounds of suppression, found within limitation, and validly "bunched" for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19 given year-wise quantification and specific allegations. The issue of potential double taxation on barter (inward and outward supplies) was left open for adjudication by GST authorities. Holding that efficacious statutory remedies under Sections 74(9) and 107 exist, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction; all writ petitions were found meritless and dismissed.
HC held that cross-LoC barter trade under the 2008 SOP constitutes intra-state supply within the then State of J&K and is amenable to CGST/J&K GST. The impugned SCNs were construed as prima facie issued under Section 74(1) CGST Act on grounds of suppression, found within limitation, and validly "bunched" for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19 given year-wise quantification and specific allegations. The issue of potential double taxation on barter (inward and outward supplies) was left open for adjudication by GST authorities. Holding that efficacious statutory remedies under Sections 74(9) and 107 exist, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction; all writ petitions were found meritless and dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.