Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the validity of the SCN issued under the CGST Act against the Petitioner at the stage of investigation, holding that presumptions under Sections 132(4A) and 292C of the IT Act are confined to IT Act proceedings and do not automatically extend to CGST proceedings. While such seized material cannot, by itself, create presumptions or constitute conclusive evidence under the CGST Act, it can legitimately form the basis for an independent GST investigation. Finding the SCN neither vague nor bereft of material particulars, HC held the writ challenge to be premature, directing the Petitioner to submit a reply, avail personal hearing, and have the SCN adjudicated in accordance with law.
HC upheld the validity of the SCN issued under the CGST Act against the Petitioner at the stage of investigation, holding that presumptions under Sections 132(4A) and 292C of the IT Act are confined to IT Act proceedings and do not automatically extend to CGST proceedings. While such seized material cannot, by itself, create presumptions or constitute conclusive evidence under the CGST Act, it can legitimately form the basis for an independent GST investigation. Finding the SCN neither vague nor bereft of material particulars, HC held the writ challenge to be premature, directing the Petitioner to submit a reply, avail personal hearing, and have the SCN adjudicated in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.