Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w 144B and the rectification order u/s 154. It held that the AO, having invoked s.50C(2), was bound to await the DVO's report and follow the procedure incorporating s.16A of the Wealth-tax Act, including affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard. Proceeding on stamp duty valuation without the DVO's determination violated the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice, rendering the assessment unsustainable. ITAT further held that the CIT(A) failed to deal with cited precedents and denied effective opportunity regarding cost and expense claims, vitiating the appellate order.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w 144B and the rectification order u/s 154. It held that the AO, having invoked s.50C(2), was bound to await the DVO's report and follow the procedure incorporating s.16A of the Wealth-tax Act, including affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard. Proceeding on stamp duty valuation without the DVO's determination violated the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice, rendering the assessment unsustainable. ITAT further held that the CIT(A) failed to deal with cited precedents and denied effective opportunity regarding cost and expense claims, vitiating the appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.