Drawings/designs supply and erection supervision fees from German contractor: designs non-taxable; supervision taxed as FTS/PE depending on six-month ...
Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w 144B and the rectification order u/s 154. It held that the AO, having invoked s.50C(2), was bound to await the DVO's report and follow the procedure incorporating s.16A of the Wealth-tax Act, including affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard. Proceeding on stamp duty valuation without the DVO's determination violated the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice, rendering the assessment unsustainable. ITAT further held that the CIT(A) failed to deal with cited precedents and denied effective opportunity regarding cost and expense claims, vitiating the appellate order.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and quashed the assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w 144B and the rectification order u/s 154. It held that the AO, having invoked s.50C(2), was bound to await the DVO's report and follow the procedure incorporating s.16A of the Wealth-tax Act, including affording the assessee an opportunity of being heard. Proceeding on stamp duty valuation without the DVO's determination violated the mandatory procedural safeguard and principles of natural justice, rendering the assessment unsustainable. ITAT further held that the CIT(A) failed to deal with cited precedents and denied effective opportunity regarding cost and expense claims, vitiating the appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.