Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the NCLT's rejection of the appellant's intervention and challenge to the approved Resolution Plan. It held that the appellant lacked locus standi, having already been denied intervention and not even being an unsuccessful Resolution Applicant, and thus was neither a necessary nor a proper party. NCLAT reiterated that adjudicating authorities cannot interfere with the commercial wisdom of the CoC absent a demonstrated violation of Section 30(2) of the I&B Code, which was not shown. Alleged information gaps and postulated asset value reduction were immaterial, as the SRA had acknowledged the liability. The appeal was found mala fide and was dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the NCLT's rejection of the appellant's intervention and challenge to the approved Resolution Plan. It held that the appellant lacked locus standi, having already been denied intervention and not even being an unsuccessful Resolution Applicant, and thus was neither a necessary nor a proper party. NCLAT reiterated that adjudicating authorities cannot interfere with the commercial wisdom of the CoC absent a demonstrated violation of Section 30(2) of the I&B Code, which was not shown. Alleged information gaps and postulated asset value reduction were immaterial, as the SRA had acknowledged the liability. The appeal was found mala fide and was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
