Imported seaweed extract provisionally released on bond only; declaratory rejection set aside; appellate decision due within section 128-A(4-A) three ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9441 to 9460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the application seeking condonation of 389 days' delay in refiling an appeal against dismissal of a Section 9 IBC application. The Tribunal held that under the IBC's time-bound framework, refiling delay can be condoned only upon demonstration of reasonable and sufficient cause beyond the appellant's control, supported by due diligence. The appellant's bare assertion that the delay was "unintentional and beyond control" was found to be no justification. Noting the inordinate delay of over one year and absence of any cogent explanation, NCLAT refused to condone the delay and consequently dismissed the memo of appeal.
NCLAT dismissed the application seeking condonation of 389 days' delay in refiling an appeal against dismissal of a Section 9 IBC application. The Tribunal held that under the IBC's time-bound framework, refiling delay can be condoned only upon demonstration of reasonable and sufficient cause beyond the appellant's control, supported by due diligence. The appellant's bare assertion that the delay was "unintentional and beyond control" was found to be no justification. Noting the inordinate delay of over one year and absence of any cogent explanation, NCLAT refused to condone the delay and consequently dismissed the memo of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
