Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition made u/s 44AD. The assessee had originally filed a return including income that actually belonged to another person due to an error by the tax consultant. Upon realizing the mistake, the assessee filed a revised computation declaring substantially higher correct income and paid the due taxes. Despite this, the AO and CIT(A) retained the disputed sum as additional income of the assessee. ITAT held that the mistake was bona fide, that tax authorities are obliged to assess only legitimate tax on correct income, and that the AO had failed in this duty. Consequently, the impugned addition of Rs. 2,55,016/- was held unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition made u/s 44AD. The assessee had originally filed a return including income that actually belonged to another person due to an error by the tax consultant. Upon realizing the mistake, the assessee filed a revised computation declaring substantially higher correct income and paid the due taxes. Despite this, the AO and CIT(A) retained the disputed sum as additional income of the assessee. ITAT held that the mistake was bona fide, that tax authorities are obliged to assess only legitimate tax on correct income, and that the AO had failed in this duty. Consequently, the impugned addition of Rs. 2,55,016/- was held unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.