Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition made u/s 44AD. The assessee had originally filed a return including income that actually belonged to another person due to an error by the tax consultant. Upon realizing the mistake, the assessee filed a revised computation declaring substantially higher correct income and paid the due taxes. Despite this, the AO and CIT(A) retained the disputed sum as additional income of the assessee. ITAT held that the mistake was bona fide, that tax authorities are obliged to assess only legitimate tax on correct income, and that the AO had failed in this duty. Consequently, the impugned addition of Rs. 2,55,016/- was held unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition made u/s 44AD. The assessee had originally filed a return including income that actually belonged to another person due to an error by the tax consultant. Upon realizing the mistake, the assessee filed a revised computation declaring substantially higher correct income and paid the due taxes. Despite this, the AO and CIT(A) retained the disputed sum as additional income of the assessee. ITAT held that the mistake was bona fide, that tax authorities are obliged to assess only legitimate tax on correct income, and that the AO had failed in this duty. Consequently, the impugned addition of Rs. 2,55,016/- was held unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
