Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
HC considered an application for regular bail by A1, accused of offences under S.61(2) BNS and Ss.7, 7A PC Act. HC noted the investigation is complete and charge sheets filed, but found strong prima facie material showing A1 as the prime conspirator, having impersonated a CGST Commissioner, orchestrated the demand for illegal gratification, and directed co-accused in execution of the conspiracy. HC relied on CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborative voice sample evidence to conclude A1's presence and role at the place of negotiation. HC further recorded adverse conduct, including evasion of CBI notices under S.35(3) BNSS and avoidance of a non-bailable warrant. Considering parity with co-accused whose bail was rejected and affirmed by SC, HC held the case unfit for bail and dismissed the bail application.
HC considered an application for regular bail by A1, accused of offences under S.61(2) BNS and Ss.7, 7A PC Act. HC noted the investigation is complete and charge sheets filed, but found strong prima facie material showing A1 as the prime conspirator, having impersonated a CGST Commissioner, orchestrated the demand for illegal gratification, and directed co-accused in execution of the conspiracy. HC relied on CCTV footage, identification by the complainant and other witnesses, and corroborative voice sample evidence to conclude A1's presence and role at the place of negotiation. HC further recorded adverse conduct, including evasion of CBI notices under S.35(3) BNSS and avoidance of a non-bailable warrant. Considering parity with co-accused whose bail was rejected and affirmed by SC, HC held the case unfit for bail and dismissed the bail application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
