PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the reassessment proceedings initiated against the Petitioner-trust were invalid and liable to be quashed. It was found that the Petitioner had duly complied with s.11(2) of the Act by filing Form 10 electronically, specifically indicating the purposes of accumulation through a referenced Resolution, which was also on record. HC held that limited space in Form 10 justified referring to the Resolution, and such reference satisfied the statutory requirement read with r.17. The reasons recorded by the AO alleging non-compliance with s.11(2) were held to be erroneous and irrelevant, particularly since the Resolution was available on the portal and considered part of the record. Having fulfilled s.11(2), the Petitioner was entitled as of right to exemption, and the reassessment was set aside.
HC held that the reassessment proceedings initiated against the Petitioner-trust were invalid and liable to be quashed. It was found that the Petitioner had duly complied with s.11(2) of the Act by filing Form 10 electronically, specifically indicating the purposes of accumulation through a referenced Resolution, which was also on record. HC held that limited space in Form 10 justified referring to the Resolution, and such reference satisfied the statutory requirement read with r.17. The reasons recorded by the AO alleging non-compliance with s.11(2) were held to be erroneous and irrelevant, particularly since the Resolution was available on the portal and considered part of the record. Having fulfilled s.11(2), the Petitioner was entitled as of right to exemption, and the reassessment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.