Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee and deleted the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notice u/s 142(1). The Tribunal noted that the assessee, a resident of the United Kingdom with no income source in India for the relevant year, had not filed a return u/s 139. It found no evidence on record that the notice u/s 142(1), dated 06.01.2023, was ever served on the assessee, stressing that the statute requires valid service, not mere issuance. As the assessment was completed ex parte, the ITAT accepted that the assessee was unaware of the proceedings and held the penalty unsustainable.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee and deleted the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notice u/s 142(1). The Tribunal noted that the assessee, a resident of the United Kingdom with no income source in India for the relevant year, had not filed a return u/s 139. It found no evidence on record that the notice u/s 142(1), dated 06.01.2023, was ever served on the assessee, stressing that the statute requires valid service, not mere issuance. As the assessment was completed ex parte, the ITAT accepted that the assessee was unaware of the proceedings and held the penalty unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.