New LODR Fifth Amendment reshapes related party transaction rules, disclosure duties, and non-convertible security communication timelines under Sched...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
8841 to 8860 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee and deleted the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notice u/s 142(1). The Tribunal noted that the assessee, a resident of the United Kingdom with no income source in India for the relevant year, had not filed a return u/s 139. It found no evidence on record that the notice u/s 142(1), dated 06.01.2023, was ever served on the assessee, stressing that the statute requires valid service, not mere issuance. As the assessment was completed ex parte, the ITAT accepted that the assessee was unaware of the proceedings and held the penalty unsustainable.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the non-resident assessee and deleted the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notice u/s 142(1). The Tribunal noted that the assessee, a resident of the United Kingdom with no income source in India for the relevant year, had not filed a return u/s 139. It found no evidence on record that the notice u/s 142(1), dated 06.01.2023, was ever served on the assessee, stressing that the statute requires valid service, not mere issuance. As the assessment was completed ex parte, the ITAT accepted that the assessee was unaware of the proceedings and held the penalty unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
