Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC disposed of the writ petition by directing coordinated action between Central and State GST authorities in line with binding precedent on Section 6(2)(b) CGST Act. HC noted that Central authority has already issued a show cause notice, while State authority has issued prior summons and DRC-01A intimation. The petitioner is mandated to appear before the Central authority, file a detailed reply to the show cause notice with all contentions and documents by the stipulated date, and comply with all lawful summons and requisitions of the State authority, including informing it of the Central proceedings. Thereafter, State and Central authorities must communicate, verify the assessee's claims, and ensure no parallel adjudication on the same subject-matter, proceeding further only in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.
HC disposed of the writ petition by directing coordinated action between Central and State GST authorities in line with binding precedent on Section 6(2)(b) CGST Act. HC noted that Central authority has already issued a show cause notice, while State authority has issued prior summons and DRC-01A intimation. The petitioner is mandated to appear before the Central authority, file a detailed reply to the show cause notice with all contentions and documents by the stipulated date, and comply with all lawful summons and requisitions of the State authority, including informing it of the Central proceedings. Thereafter, State and Central authorities must communicate, verify the assessee's claims, and ensure no parallel adjudication on the same subject-matter, proceeding further only in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.