Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC allowed the petition filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the IT Act, holding that successive resignations of key accounts personnel at the petitioner-company's remote location constituted reasonable and sufficient cause for delay in filing the return for AY 2024-25. HC found that the non-filing within the statutory deadline occurred despite exercise of ordinary business care and prudence and was beyond the petitioner's control. The impugned order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the PCIT rejecting condonation of delay was quashed. HC directed the concerned authority to treat the return and audit report for AY 2024-25 as having been filed within the prescribed period and to grant all consequential benefits and reliefs in accordance with the IT Act and applicable circulars/notifications.
HC allowed the petition filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the IT Act, holding that successive resignations of key accounts personnel at the petitioner-company's remote location constituted reasonable and sufficient cause for delay in filing the return for AY 2024-25. HC found that the non-filing within the statutory deadline occurred despite exercise of ordinary business care and prudence and was beyond the petitioner's control. The impugned order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the PCIT rejecting condonation of delay was quashed. HC directed the concerned authority to treat the return and audit report for AY 2024-25 as having been filed within the prescribed period and to grant all consequential benefits and reliefs in accordance with the IT Act and applicable circulars/notifications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
