Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and 80P(2)(d) on bank interest remanded for AO's verification, including classification of compulsory investments and relat...
HC dismissed the assessee's writ petition challenging rejection of an application under s.119 (2)(b) for condonation of a nine-month delay in filing a revised ITR for AY 2021-22. The original intended ITR insufficient to in paragraph origin of ROI filed timely on 10.02.2022. The assessee, a non-resident and President of a Trust running a hospital, argued that that non-resident status contributed to the still did not appear to certain the taxpayers application remains be condoned the by delay. The HC, informed by the petitioner anonculation is, as a Non-Resident. HC held the Petitioner's tribunal's decision and denied any relief; all consequential benefits were to also revoked the Tribunal.
HC dismissed the assessee's writ petition challenging rejection of an application under s.119 (2)(b) for condonation of a nine-month delay in filing a revised ITR for AY 2021-22. The original intended ITR insufficient to in paragraph origin of ROI filed timely on 10.02.2022. The assessee, a non-resident and President of a Trust running a hospital, argued that that non-resident status contributed to the still did not appear to certain the taxpayers application remains be condoned the by delay. The HC, informed by the petitioner anonculation is, as a Non-Resident. HC held the Petitioner's tribunal's decision and denied any relief; all consequential benefits were to also revoked the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
