Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
ITAT held the reassessment proceedings invalid on the ground that the notice issued under s.148 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after the relevant CBDT notification was without legal authority under the faceless assessment scheme. Following the binding ruling of the Telangana HC, ITAT quashed the impugned s.148 notice dated 07.04.2022 and, consequentially, the reassessment framed thereunder. ITAT noted that the issue is pending before the SC in a Revenue SLP concerning similar legal questions and recorded that the parties are at liberty to seek revival and modification of this order depending on the SC's final decision. The assessee's appeal was accordingly allowed, with liberty as stated.
ITAT held the reassessment proceedings invalid on the ground that the notice issued under s.148 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after the relevant CBDT notification was without legal authority under the faceless assessment scheme. Following the binding ruling of the Telangana HC, ITAT quashed the impugned s.148 notice dated 07.04.2022 and, consequentially, the reassessment framed thereunder. ITAT noted that the issue is pending before the SC in a Revenue SLP concerning similar legal questions and recorded that the parties are at liberty to seek revival and modification of this order depending on the SC's final decision. The assessee's appeal was accordingly allowed, with liberty as stated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
