Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2921 to 2940 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held the reassessment proceedings invalid on the ground that the notice issued under s.148 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after the relevant CBDT notification was without legal authority under the faceless assessment scheme. Following the binding ruling of the Telangana HC, ITAT quashed the impugned s.148 notice dated 07.04.2022 and, consequentially, the reassessment framed thereunder. ITAT noted that the issue is pending before the SC in a Revenue SLP concerning similar legal questions and recorded that the parties are at liberty to seek revival and modification of this order depending on the SC's final decision. The assessee's appeal was accordingly allowed, with liberty as stated.
ITAT held the reassessment proceedings invalid on the ground that the notice issued under s.148 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) after the relevant CBDT notification was without legal authority under the faceless assessment scheme. Following the binding ruling of the Telangana HC, ITAT quashed the impugned s.148 notice dated 07.04.2022 and, consequentially, the reassessment framed thereunder. ITAT noted that the issue is pending before the SC in a Revenue SLP concerning similar legal questions and recorded that the parties are at liberty to seek revival and modification of this order depending on the SC's final decision. The assessee's appeal was accordingly allowed, with liberty as stated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
