Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the show cause notice on GST classification, holding them non-maintainable in view of the efficacious alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the proper Adjudicating Authority had issued the notice, and the case did not disclose either lack of jurisdiction or violation of natural justice to justify writ interference at the notice stage. The Petitioners were directed to submit their replies, raise all permissible legal and factual defences, and produce all relevant material before the Adjudicating Authority, which is best suited to undertake the necessary factual inquiry and determine the correct classification. Consequently, the HC declined to bypass the appellate hierarchy and refused to quash the show cause notice, dismissing the petitions.
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the show cause notice on GST classification, holding them non-maintainable in view of the efficacious alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the proper Adjudicating Authority had issued the notice, and the case did not disclose either lack of jurisdiction or violation of natural justice to justify writ interference at the notice stage. The Petitioners were directed to submit their replies, raise all permissible legal and factual defences, and produce all relevant material before the Adjudicating Authority, which is best suited to undertake the necessary factual inquiry and determine the correct classification. Consequently, the HC declined to bypass the appellate hierarchy and refused to quash the show cause notice, dismissing the petitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.