Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A) in toto. It held that addition under s.41(1) was unsustainable as the alleged loans of Rs.1.06 crore, though unsupported by confirmations, were admittedly utilized for capital purposes before commencement of business, negating any remission or cessation of a trading liability. The Tribunal further affirmed deletion of disallowance under s.37, noting that the assessee had produced bills, vouchers and ledgers, and the AO's ad hoc disallowance for want of evidence lacked factual foundation. Disallowance under s.40A(3) was also rejected since the impugned payments were made through banking channels. Finally, the ITAT sustained deletion of disallowance of audit fees and statutory dues, holding the provisions genuine and duly reflected in audited accounts.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A) in toto. It held that addition under s.41(1) was unsustainable as the alleged loans of Rs.1.06 crore, though unsupported by confirmations, were admittedly utilized for capital purposes before commencement of business, negating any remission or cessation of a trading liability. The Tribunal further affirmed deletion of disallowance under s.37, noting that the assessee had produced bills, vouchers and ledgers, and the AO's ad hoc disallowance for want of evidence lacked factual foundation. Disallowance under s.40A(3) was also rejected since the impugned payments were made through banking channels. Finally, the ITAT sustained deletion of disallowance of audit fees and statutory dues, holding the provisions genuine and duly reflected in audited accounts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.