Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order, holding that the movables and inventory lying in the leased premises formed part of the liquidation estate of the corporate debtor under S.36 IBC. The burden to rebut the presumption of ownership lay on the appellant, who failed to produce credible contemporaneous evidence before the Adjudicating Authority or NCLAT, including invoices supporting the SAP records. NCLAT noted the appellant's prolonged inaction and held there was tacit acquiescence to the corporate debtor's ownership, especially as the appellant, a signatory to the SPA, had opportunity to object during CIRP and liquidation. As the assets were already sold, sale certificate issued, and proceeds distributed, NCLAT found no infirmity or ground for interference and dismissed the appeal.
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order, holding that the movables and inventory lying in the leased premises formed part of the liquidation estate of the corporate debtor under S.36 IBC. The burden to rebut the presumption of ownership lay on the appellant, who failed to produce credible contemporaneous evidence before the Adjudicating Authority or NCLAT, including invoices supporting the SAP records. NCLAT noted the appellant's prolonged inaction and held there was tacit acquiescence to the corporate debtor's ownership, especially as the appellant, a signatory to the SPA, had opportunity to object during CIRP and liquidation. As the assets were already sold, sale certificate issued, and proceeds distributed, NCLAT found no infirmity or ground for interference and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
