Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made on account of alleged under-reporting of duty drawback. ITAT held that the assessee's consistent and bona fide accounting policy of recognizing duty drawback income on receipt (cash) basis, in line with prudence and prevailing trade practice, is acceptable and does not distort true income. It noted that the assessee had substantiated the actual duty drawback received during the relevant year through ledgers and sample shipping bills and that there was no revenue leakage, as the timing difference arose solely from the method of accounting. Applying the principles of consistency and recognizing that the right to receive becomes taxable on receipt basis in such circumstances, ITAT concluded that the method followed was fair and valid. Consequently, the addition made by the lower authorities was set aside and the assessee's appeal was allowed in full.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made on account of alleged under-reporting of duty drawback. ITAT held that the assessee's consistent and bona fide accounting policy of recognizing duty drawback income on receipt (cash) basis, in line with prudence and prevailing trade practice, is acceptable and does not distort true income. It noted that the assessee had substantiated the actual duty drawback received during the relevant year through ledgers and sample shipping bills and that there was no revenue leakage, as the timing difference arose solely from the method of accounting. Applying the principles of consistency and recognizing that the right to receive becomes taxable on receipt basis in such circumstances, ITAT concluded that the method followed was fair and valid. Consequently, the addition made by the lower authorities was set aside and the assessee's appeal was allowed in full.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.