Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that the applications u/s 95 IBC filed by the creditor against the personal guarantors of the principal borrower were within limitation. The Tribunal noted two relevant dates: 27.06.2019 (recovery certificate) and 23.09.2019 (acceptance of OTS proposal by the borrower). The latter constituted an acknowledgment of debt under applicable limitation principles, thereby commencing a fresh three-year limitation period, further extended by exclusion of 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 pursuant to SC orders on Covid-19. Consequently, the application filed on 10.08.2024 was held timely. NCLAT also rejected the guarantors' contention that their guarantees had not been validly invoked, holding that the notice dated 29.11.2013 under Rule 7 was a statutory notice issued after invocation. Finding no merit in the grounds urged, NCLAT dismissed all appeals filed by the guarantors.
NCLAT held that the applications u/s 95 IBC filed by the creditor against the personal guarantors of the principal borrower were within limitation. The Tribunal noted two relevant dates: 27.06.2019 (recovery certificate) and 23.09.2019 (acceptance of OTS proposal by the borrower). The latter constituted an acknowledgment of debt under applicable limitation principles, thereby commencing a fresh three-year limitation period, further extended by exclusion of 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 pursuant to SC orders on Covid-19. Consequently, the application filed on 10.08.2024 was held timely. NCLAT also rejected the guarantors' contention that their guarantees had not been validly invoked, holding that the notice dated 29.11.2013 under Rule 7 was a statutory notice issued after invocation. Finding no merit in the grounds urged, NCLAT dismissed all appeals filed by the guarantors.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
