Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the provisional attachment order (PAO) and show cause notice (SCN) issued under the PMLA, holding them to be legally sustainable. It ruled the petitions were not maintainable in view of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy of appeal, and none of the limited contingencies justifying writ interference under Art. 226 of the COI were established. The HC found sufficient material for the Directorate and Adjudicating Authority (AA) to form the requisite "reason to believe," and held the attached properties constituted "proceeds of crime" arising from scheduled offences linked to an international cricket betting racket. The AA's composition and issuance of SCN, even absent prior attachment, were held valid. All petitions by A were dismissed.
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the provisional attachment order (PAO) and show cause notice (SCN) issued under the PMLA, holding them to be legally sustainable. It ruled the petitions were not maintainable in view of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy of appeal, and none of the limited contingencies justifying writ interference under Art. 226 of the COI were established. The HC found sufficient material for the Directorate and Adjudicating Authority (AA) to form the requisite "reason to believe," and held the attached properties constituted "proceeds of crime" arising from scheduled offences linked to an international cricket betting racket. The AA's composition and issuance of SCN, even absent prior attachment, were held valid. All petitions by A were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.