CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
HC set aside the impugned order cancelling the GST registration of A and allowed the writ petition. The Court held that the cancellation order was a non-speaking order, as the proper officer rejected A's explanation merely stating it was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons, violating fundamental principles of natural justice and procedural law. Recognizing that cancellation of GST registration has severe consequences, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail/pass on ITC, the HC found the action unsustainable in law. The matter was remitted, and the HC directed that its order, along with a copy of the petition, be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P., within one week.
HC set aside the impugned order cancelling the GST registration of A and allowed the writ petition. The Court held that the cancellation order was a non-speaking order, as the proper officer rejected A's explanation merely stating it was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons, violating fundamental principles of natural justice and procedural law. Recognizing that cancellation of GST registration has severe consequences, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail/pass on ITC, the HC found the action unsustainable in law. The matter was remitted, and the HC directed that its order, along with a copy of the petition, be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P., within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
