Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
HC set aside the impugned order cancelling the GST registration of A and allowed the writ petition. The Court held that the cancellation order was a non-speaking order, as the proper officer rejected A's explanation merely stating it was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons, violating fundamental principles of natural justice and procedural law. Recognizing that cancellation of GST registration has severe consequences, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail/pass on ITC, the HC found the action unsustainable in law. The matter was remitted, and the HC directed that its order, along with a copy of the petition, be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P., within one week.
HC set aside the impugned order cancelling the GST registration of A and allowed the writ petition. The Court held that the cancellation order was a non-speaking order, as the proper officer rejected A's explanation merely stating it was "not satisfactory" without disclosing any reasons, violating fundamental principles of natural justice and procedural law. Recognizing that cancellation of GST registration has severe consequences, including inability to issue tax invoices or avail/pass on ITC, the HC found the action unsustainable in law. The matter was remitted, and the HC directed that its order, along with a copy of the petition, be communicated to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P., within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
