Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC considered a writ petition challenging the impugned assessment order and consequential Order in Form GST DRC-07, preceded by a SCN in Form GST DRC-01. The statutory limitation under Section 107 of the GST enactments for filing an appeal had expired by the time the petition was instituted. Noting earlier precedents where delayed challenges led to remand on conditions of partial tax deposit, HC adopted a similar approach. The impugned order and consequential demand were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Respondent authority for fresh adjudication, subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days. Petition disposed.
HC considered a writ petition challenging the impugned assessment order and consequential Order in Form GST DRC-07, preceded by a SCN in Form GST DRC-01. The statutory limitation under Section 107 of the GST enactments for filing an appeal had expired by the time the petition was instituted. Noting earlier precedents where delayed challenges led to remand on conditions of partial tax deposit, HC adopted a similar approach. The impugned order and consequential demand were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Respondent authority for fresh adjudication, subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the electronic cash ledger within thirty days. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
