New 2025 Fourth Amendment tightens governance, executive roles and tech leadership for recognised stock exchanges, clearing corporations under 2018 Re...
ITAT held that the doctrine of merger did not apply to the intimation issued u/s 143(1) where the specific adjustments and interest u/s 115P made therein were neither reversed nor adjudicated in the subsequent scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) r.w.s. 144B. Consequently, the intimation u/s 143(1) continued to subsist independently, and a separate appeal against it before CIT(A) was legally maintainable. ITAT found that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal on the ground that the order u/s 143(1) had merged with the later assessment order. ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits the grounds raised by the assessee against the intimation u/s 143(1).
ITAT held that the doctrine of merger did not apply to the intimation issued u/s 143(1) where the specific adjustments and interest u/s 115P made therein were neither reversed nor adjudicated in the subsequent scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(3) r.w.s. 144B. Consequently, the intimation u/s 143(1) continued to subsist independently, and a separate appeal against it before CIT(A) was legally maintainable. ITAT found that CIT(A) erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal on the ground that the order u/s 143(1) had merged with the later assessment order. ITAT set aside the order of CIT(A) and directed CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits the grounds raised by the assessee against the intimation u/s 143(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
