Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
AAR held that services rendered by the applicant to the recipient-society are not exempt under Entry 72 of Notif. No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) because the recipient, though under administrative control and funding of the State, is a separate legal entity registered as a society and cannot be treated as the Central/State Government or a Government Department. It may at best qualify as a Governmental Authority/Entity, but the training, skill development and capacity-building services supplied do not fall within the limited categories exempted under Entry 3B of Notif. No. 13/2023-CT (Rate). Consequently, the supplies are taxable. As a corollary, AAR held the applicant is entitled to full ITC on GST charged by subcontractors for such services, subject to satisfaction of statutory conditions under the CGST Act and Rules.
AAR held that services rendered by the applicant to the recipient-society are not exempt under Entry 72 of Notif. No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) because the recipient, though under administrative control and funding of the State, is a separate legal entity registered as a society and cannot be treated as the Central/State Government or a Government Department. It may at best qualify as a Governmental Authority/Entity, but the training, skill development and capacity-building services supplied do not fall within the limited categories exempted under Entry 3B of Notif. No. 13/2023-CT (Rate). Consequently, the supplies are taxable. As a corollary, AAR held the applicant is entitled to full ITC on GST charged by subcontractors for such services, subject to satisfaction of statutory conditions under the CGST Act and Rules.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
