Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
AAR held that renting of residential dwellings by unregistered landlords to the applicant, a registered entity, constitutes a taxable supply of services to the applicant under GST. The employer-employee relationship applies only between the applicant and its employees, not between the landlords and the applicant; therefore, the exemption for residential dwelling services is inapplicable. Consequently, GST is payable by the applicant under the Reverse Charge Mechanism on rent paid to unregistered landlords. Further, AAR held that, in view of s.17(2) read with s.2(47), the applicant is not eligible to claim ITC on GST paid under reverse charge, as the corresponding outward supply to employees is an exempt supply.
AAR held that renting of residential dwellings by unregistered landlords to the applicant, a registered entity, constitutes a taxable supply of services to the applicant under GST. The employer-employee relationship applies only between the applicant and its employees, not between the landlords and the applicant; therefore, the exemption for residential dwelling services is inapplicable. Consequently, GST is payable by the applicant under the Reverse Charge Mechanism on rent paid to unregistered landlords. Further, AAR held that, in view of s.17(2) read with s.2(47), the applicant is not eligible to claim ITC on GST paid under reverse charge, as the corresponding outward supply to employees is an exempt supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.