Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC examined levy of penalty under s.74 CGST Act where tax with interest was paid prior to issuance of SCN. HC noted the distinction between s.74(5) and s.74(8), holding that on payment of tax, interest and 15% penalty after notice under s.74(1) read with s.74(3), further proceedings stand terminated. In this case, the petitioner had already discharged tax and interest pursuant to summons, and the subsequent demand-cum-SCN under s.74(1) yielded a maximum penalty of Rs. 19,000/-. HC held that relegating the petitioner to appeal would be unjustified. HC directed that on deposit of 15% of the penalty within four weeks, the impugned order shall stand quashed qua the petitioner alone, with no benefit extended to other noticees. Petition disposed.
HC examined levy of penalty under s.74 CGST Act where tax with interest was paid prior to issuance of SCN. HC noted the distinction between s.74(5) and s.74(8), holding that on payment of tax, interest and 15% penalty after notice under s.74(1) read with s.74(3), further proceedings stand terminated. In this case, the petitioner had already discharged tax and interest pursuant to summons, and the subsequent demand-cum-SCN under s.74(1) yielded a maximum penalty of Rs. 19,000/-. HC held that relegating the petitioner to appeal would be unjustified. HC directed that on deposit of 15% of the penalty within four weeks, the impugned order shall stand quashed qua the petitioner alone, with no benefit extended to other noticees. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
