Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
AAR held that the applicant is entitled to avail ITC only on GST paid on rent for June 2022, subject to compliance with the time limit prescribed under S.16(4) CGST Act. It was determined that invoices pertaining to periods when the landlord was unregistered do not constitute valid tax invoices for ITC, as the supplier lacked registration and such invoices were also issued beyond the time limit stipulated in R.47 CGST Rules. Consequently, ITC on those invoices is inadmissible. On the query whether availment of such ITC would invite audit or departmental scrutiny, AAR declined to answer, holding it outside the scope of S.97(2) CGST Act.
AAR held that the applicant is entitled to avail ITC only on GST paid on rent for June 2022, subject to compliance with the time limit prescribed under S.16(4) CGST Act. It was determined that invoices pertaining to periods when the landlord was unregistered do not constitute valid tax invoices for ITC, as the supplier lacked registration and such invoices were also issued beyond the time limit stipulated in R.47 CGST Rules. Consequently, ITC on those invoices is inadmissible. On the query whether availment of such ITC would invite audit or departmental scrutiny, AAR declined to answer, holding it outside the scope of S.97(2) CGST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
